Re: Random interesting but important link for OM and Jorge!
From: Scott Hedrick (dinehnm_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/14/05
- Next message: Paul Maxson: "Paul Maxson PLONK and filter test #10 *ignore* OT"
- Previous message: Terrell Miller: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- In reply to: OM: "Re: Random interesting but important link for OM and Jorge!"
- Next in thread: Derek Lyons: "Re: Random interesting but important link for OM and Jorge!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:42:08 -0500
"OM" <om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_research_facility.org> wrote
in message news:mlka31t855sct86ugf9knm42u0jlkobpgn@4ax.com...
> ...Yet another Maxson lie. Protecting people and property is not a bad
> thing. What *IS* a bad thing is that you're going around pretending to
> be a security guard.
So, would this be a step up or down from Daddy's job as a janitor?
- Next message: Paul Maxson: "Paul Maxson PLONK and filter test #10 *ignore* OT"
- Previous message: Terrell Miller: "Re: STS51L Accident Questions"
- In reply to: OM: "Re: Random interesting but important link for OM and Jorge!"
- Next in thread: Derek Lyons: "Re: Random interesting but important link for OM and Jorge!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
