Re: Pima Titan 2003
- From: henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Henry Spencer)
- Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:02:26 GMT
In article <4crv41dcr1hn6gg5nisv7h23o93pnatqi8@xxxxxxx>,
Rusty <reuben_barton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>It looks like it has been test fired. I wonder if most liquid fueled
>rocket engines on ICBM's were test fired (either before of after being
>installed on the missile). It would seem the Air Force would want to
>make sure it had a good missile before putting it in a silo.
Non-ablative liquid engines are invariably test-fired at the end of
manufacturing -- typically before they're installed -- for several
reasons, not least being performance calibration.
Static firing of complete stages is unusual now, but in Titan I days,
it was common.
--
"Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer
-- George Herbert | henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pima Titan 2003
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Pima Titan 2003
- From: Ilpo Lagerstedt
- Re: Pima Titan 2003
- References:
- Pima Titan 2003
- From: marich2
- Re: Pima Titan 2003
- From: Rusty
- Re: Pima Titan 2003
- From: marich2
- Re: Pima Titan 2003
- From: Rusty
- Pima Titan 2003
- Prev by Date: Re: What a let down. . .
- Next by Date: Re: What a let down. . .
- Previous by thread: Re: Pima Titan 2003
- Next by thread: Re: Pima Titan 2003
- Index(es):
Loading