Re: What a let down. . .
- From: Damon Hill <damon1six1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 20:09:50 -0500
OM <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
in news:v9jb51dpb3b0jql3m7ekuuhp2q8fcop02r@xxxxxxx:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:32:13 -0400, "Ami Silberman" <silber@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>I've heard that there is some sentiment for amending the constitution so
>>that he would be eligible.
>
> ...There's the other side of that one: Most Americans are amiable
> towards such an amendment if it *only* applied to Ah-Nuld.
And I am >very< much opposed to trivializing the Constitution!
Sorry, Arnold.
--Damon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What a let down. . .
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: What a let down. . .
- From: Neil Gerace
- Re: What a let down. . .
- References:
- Re: What a let down. . .
- From: D . Scott Ferrin
- Re: What a let down. . .
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: What a let down. . .
- From: D . Scott Ferrin
- Re: What a let down. . .
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: What a let down. . .
- From: D . Scott Ferrin
- Re: What a let down. . .
- From: Jonathan Silverlight
- Re: What a let down. . .
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: What a let down. . .
- From: Rusty
- Re: What a let down. . .
- From: Ami Silberman
- Re: What a let down. . .
- From: Damon Hill
- Re: What a let down. . .
- From: Ami Silberman
- Re: What a let down. . .
- From: OM
- Re: What a let down. . .
- Prev by Date: Re: What a let down. . .
- Next by Date: Re: What a let down. . .
- Previous by thread: Re: What a let down. . .
- Next by thread: Re: What a let down. . .
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|