Re: Voyager sterilisation?

From: "Neil Gerace" <geracen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:26:17 +0800

"Jonathan Silverlight" <jsilverlight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
in message

> Minor correction - I don't think Titan can be called scientifically
> uninteresting (it's a major reason why Cassini went) but Voyager 1 showed
> that there was nothing Voyager 2 could add, given the same instruments.

That's why it can be called uninteresting - given the same hardware, nothing
new could be learned.

.

References:
- Voyager sterilisation?
  - From: Andrew Gray
- Re: Voyager sterilisation?
  - From: Jonathan Silverlight

Prev by Date: Re: Apollo CM Space
Next by Date: Re: Apollo CM Space
Previous by thread: Re: Voyager sterilisation?
Next by thread: Re: Voyager sterilisation?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Saturns Rings
... There is an observation that spokes appear in Saturns rings origianly from ... Voyager but now from Cassini. ... It seems obvious that these are some optical effect and not a physical one. ...
(sci.astro.amateur)
Re: Saturns Rings
... Voyager but now from Cassini. ... It seems obvious that these are some optical effect and not a physical one. ... I believe the waves of light are producing ...
(sci.astro.amateur)