Re: now ~CT-infested -- Re: Q: For Sy Liebergot (Yeah, it's new safe CT-free topic fodder!)


> On 2005-05-08, Stuf4 <tdadamemd-spamblock-@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The issue was regarding *how* NASA published it.

Buy a copy of the report, spend $300 on Adobe Acrobat, and *do it yourself*
instead of whining about it.

> > Books are very 20th century. Indexes worked ok in the 20th century.

And when the power's out, or you simply don't have the particular machine
with the encyclopedia/dictionary/whatever booted, you can still use the book
*and* the index.

> > But I'm sure we can agree that we've progressed way beyond that.

Who's "we"? You've amply demonstrated that you haven't yet progressed *to*
books.

> > Perhaps here you (or someone else) would like to demonstrate the
> > minimum number of steps it might take for someone who has never seen
> > the report to get to this one page (or a website with similar info):

Perhaps you should stop being such a dumbass and wander down to a university
library and *look it up*.

> > I suggest you try engaging in a discussion
> > where you hold one position and dozens of people argue against that.

You first.

> > There are certain limits to one person's time and energy.

Boo fuckin' hoo. If you believe that's the case, then stop pissing and
moaning and start scanning the report yourself in whatever format you want.
Or, pay someone to do it for you.


.

Quantcast