Re: Why is science, space, and history so inportent?
- From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondaleakirk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:52:02 GMT
OM wrote:
> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>> You guys are just jaded, cynical and curmudgeonly.
> ...You're just pissed because we're picking on your
> little sister, Rhon. But you're right - we should be
> picking on *you*, because you should have trained her
> better before letting her loose on usenet unchapperoned.
I don't have a little sister, Bob, but about six years ago,
I had a 15-year old daughter of my own. :) It's hard to
believe she's going to be street-legal in July, but I don't
have to think very hard to recall what she was like at 15.
If Kelli (k-girl15) isn't 15, she's doing a very good job of
sounding 15.
And you've never needed an *excuse* to pick on me, so why
start now? ;)
rl
.
- References:
- Why is science, space, and history so inportent?
- From: guesswhokt
- Re: Why is science, space, and history so inportent?
- From: The Rocket Scientist
- Re: Why is science, space, and history so inportent?
- From: Rhonda Lea Kirk
- Re: Why is science, space, and history so inportent?
- From: OM
- Why is science, space, and history so inportent?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT- meanwhile, back at Cold Fusion
- Next by Date: Re: Why is science, space, and history so inportent?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is science, space, and history so inportent?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is science, space, and history so inportent?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
