Re: OT-poor piloting
- From: "Reunite Gondwanaland (Mary Shafer)" <reunite.gondwana@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 21:59:30 -0700
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 07:23:38 -0500, Herb Schaltegger
<herb.schaltegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:41:14 -0500, Reunite Gondwanaland (Mary Shafer)
> wrote
> (in article <lg94c1tjkeb66r7fftt366c70auh32sv9e@xxxxxxx>):
>
> > On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 15:53:03 -0500, Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Peter Stickney wrote:
> >>
> >>> Arggh! I can't take it any more. Pat, those big things on the back
> >>> of the airplane are Engines, not Motors, dammit!
> >>
> >> http://www.samsmodels.demon.co.uk/rapier.html
> >> See, over there they call them motors.
> >
> > On USN attack aircraft they're blowers.
>
> I was taught in my basic Aerospace Propulsion class that an "engine"
> has moving parts (i.e., a gas turbine) to convert power to motion. A
> "motor" (such as solid-fueled rocket or electric motor) does not have
> moving parts to convert power to motion.
I don't think a ramjet or a scramjet is a motor, but neither has
moving parts.
> Yeah, it's a not a perfect definition but it's what I use most of the
> time.
I think the whole thing is confused enough already that no simple rule
is going to take care of it.
Mary "what's an RCS unit?"
--
Mary Shafer Retired aerospace research engineer
We didn't just do weird stuff at Dryden, we wrote reports about it.
reunite.gondwana@xxxxxxxxx or miliff@xxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT-poor piloting
- From: Herb Schaltegger
- Re: OT-poor piloting
- Prev by Date: Re: The Right Stuff Update
- Next by Date: Re: OT-poor piloting
- Previous by thread: Re: New NASA chief begins major shake-up
- Next by thread: Re: OT-poor piloting
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|