Re: 2 new Apollo Panoramas

Dear Mike Constantine,
I'd forgotten to ask of your lord/wizard "moonpans" expertise and of
any others about where the heck had all of the secondary/recoil photons
gone, since the photographic Kodak moments were essentially unfiltered
(in other words of being essentially wide open band-pass of accepting
375~875 nm), yet absolutely none of those extreme intensities of
photons or of anything whatsoever worth of secondary/recoil managed to
get recorded regardless of whatever the shaded and/or fully solar
illuminated environment. It's almost exactly as though we're looking at
an artificially xenon lamp illuminated terrain and, from the original
scanned official archive of such images as having depicted such scenes
as a somewhat subdued amount of blue spectrum at that. What is it about
the lunar atmosphere that so nicely filtered out even more of the
near-UV (375~425 nm), and excluded that of the UV spectrum than for
here on Earth?

How is it that secondary/recoil photons that seem to occur quite nicely
here upon Earth but not upon our moon?

BTW; Where the heck was good old Venus hiding and that of the extremely
bright near-blue and near-UV intensity worth of the Sirius star system
(of which I'm not referring to the human visual intensity, as that's
not worth 1% of what the unfiltered Kodak eye was capable of
recording)?
~

Don't look: in spite of your orchestrated status quo, it seems there's
been other life upon Venus
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator) as interactive
within the ME-L1/EM-L2 sweet-spot
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Proto-moons, Venus ETs, Earthly ETs plus a few other somewhat testy
topics by; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

.

Quantcast