Re: moon landings were a hoax

Matt Wiser and mitcheroo,
Obviously your being equally certified as NASA's official LLPOF incest
cloned borgs of the mainstream status quo suits yourselves to a bloody
T. This is essentially what I'd previously offered to yet another of
NASA's commecial infomercial as contributed by spook/wizard "moonpans".

Dear Mike Constantine (AKA moonpans),
I see that you've finally gotten around to PhotoShop cranking up the
otherwise subdued (xenon illuminated) blue of the American flag, but
you still have that nearly entirely 55+% albedo moonscape that's
somewhat impossible, and still nothing whatsoever of the horrifically
bright Sirius star system, or that of a nearby and intensely (75+%)
reflective Venus that must have been rather intensely annoying on at
least two of the Apollo missions.
http://moonpans.com/a11neilmesa.htm

Being that the moonsuits were typically 80 some odd percent reflective
(perhaps 85% reflective if sufficiently dust free), it seems that the
average albedo worth of 11~12% of the raw solar illuminated and via a
polarised filter at that should have been nearly coal like, and
certainly depicting as a whole lot more of carbon, iron and titanium
dusty to moonboot.

I especially like the official looking page of those autographed photos
that are nearly of lunar white-out zones as having absolutely zilch,
nada as in zero worth of secondary/recoil photons of anything the least
bit near-blue, much less offering any hard-X-ray dosage as having been
proven a matter of hard-scientific fact by even terrestrial satellite
instruments.
http://moonpans.com/signed/

Any chance you could get Kodak Corporate to inform us village idiots as
to exactly how their photo-chemical (color sensitive emulsion dyes)
worth of your skewed/conditional physics works entirely differently
upon the moon than upon Earth?

2nd reply; Dear Mike Constantine,
I'd forgotten to ask of your lord/wizard "moonpans" expertise and of
any others about where the heck had all of the secondary/recoil photons
gone, since the photographic Kodak moments were essentially unfiltered
(in other words of being essentially wide open band-pass of accepting
375~875 nm), yet absolutely none of those extreme intensities of
photons or of anything whatsoever worth of secondary/recoil managed to
get recorded regardless of whatever the shaded and/or fully solar
illuminated environment. It's almost exactly as though we're looking at
an artificially xenon lamp illuminated terrain and, from the original
scanned official archive of such images as having depicted such scenes
as a somewhat subdued amount of blue spectrum at that. What is it about
the lunar atmosphere that so nicely filtered out even more of the
near-UV (375~425 nm), and excluded that of the UV spectrum than for
here on Earth?

How is it that secondary/recoil photons that seem to occur quite nicely
here upon Earth but not upon our moon?

BTW; Where the heck was good old Venus hiding and that of the extremely
bright near-blue and near-UV intensity worth of the Sirius star system
(of which I'm not referring to the human visual intensity, as that's
not worth 1% of what the unfiltered Kodak eye was capable of
recording)?
~

Don't look: in spite of your orchestrated status quo, it seems there's
been other life upon Venus
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator) as interactive
within the ME-L1/EM-L2 sweet-spot
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Proto-moons, Venus ETs, Earthly ETs plus a few other somewhat testy
topics by; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 2 new Apollo Panoramas
    ... photons or of anything whatsoever worth of secondary/recoil managed to ... How is it that secondary/recoil photons that seem to occur quite nicely ... Where the heck was good old Venus hiding and that of the extremely ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: Moon landings were a hoax
    ... of their perpetrated cold-war worth of absolute crapolla. ... has Venus to do with the moon? ... photo/Kodak moment recorded is simply proof-positive that folks ... available hard-science that's been available about Venus, ...
    (rec.aviation.military)
  • Re: I take objection to NASAs Mars plans!
    ... butt-naked upon the moon is obviously bad enough. ... value as an all-around human simply isn't worth all that much within my ... be looking as hard as possible at Venus instead of Mars. ... extremely dark and nasty lunar terrain as having ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: MOON CONSPIRACY & HOAX: CHARLIE DUKE - Family Abuser, NEIL ARMSTRONG - Reclusive, GE
    ... butt-naked upon the moon is obviously bad enough. ... value as an all-around human simply isn't worth all that much within my ... be looking as hard as possible at Venus instead of Mars. ... extremely dark and nasty lunar terrain as having ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: MOON CONSPIRACY & HOAX: CHARLIE DUKE - Family Abuser, NEIL ARMSTRONG - Reclusive, GE
    ... Just for saying we haven't walked upon the moon is obviously bad ... value as an all-around human simply isn't worth all that much within my ... be looking as hard as possible at Venus instead of Mars. ... extremely dark and nasty lunar terrain as having ...
    (sci.space.history)