Re: moon landings were a hoax

Matt Wiser,
If you and others really cared about salvaging our NASA, in that case
you'd kick some serious butts, including your own sorry butt while
you're at it.

It seems as though you're mostly all about being your cloak and dagger
self, plus MOS anti-ET, or otherwise having to be another all around
wizard/expert upon ET intelligence (mostly as to their lack of having
any intelligence), of their biological evolution that apparently sucks
and of whatever learned expertise that isn't worth squat, at the same
time you're having to continually mainstream status quo disregard by
way of evidence excluding upon the available pressure, density and
enormous amounts of available green/renewable energy that Venus seems
to offer way more than it's fair share of.

Please explain as to why the regular laws of physics-101 not usable
upon our moon or that of Venus?

Is this some degree of conditional physics requirement that supposedly
had our crews walking moonsuit naked upon the moon and somehow living
as to tell us about it?

Why are your ETs having to be so pathetically dumb and dumber than the
likes of humanity?

Why does Venus have to become the least bit suitable for accommodating
mere humans, naked no less?

Don't you folks realize there are environments of such extremes as bad
if not worse off upon Earth, in which we've survived via applied
technology? And to think, at best we're not even half as ET smart.
-
In another recent reply to Warhol; What do you consider as "urgent
things first..."?
>I have always had a work logic, that means the urgent things first...
Firstly; I'd have to agree upon and promote the notion that ETs have
been here and are probably pitching a serious fit right about now,
perhaps via usenet spooks and moles accomplishing as much wag-the-dog
and performing as much damage-control as possible. At least if I were
an ET that's exactly what I'd be doing.

Secondly; I'm not suggesting that we shouldn't be getting along with
accomplishing our moon, especially for establishing the LSE-CM/ISS,
thus accomplishing a great deal of good on behalf of Earth-science as
well as moon-science and, thereby directly benefiting future astronomy
as well as the greater portions of humanity in so many ways that most
folks can't even imagine. I'm also not suggesting that we should be
going to in person to visit upon the surface of Venus, at least not
when the likes of a relatively small and thus efficient in terms of
cost as well as energy of what TRACE-VL2 would more than suffice as
residing in a halo-orbit within the Venus-L2 gravity-well or somewhat
of an interactive nullification zone which would enable our keeping a
good track upon the nighttime season of Venus, tremendously improving
upon whatever odds of interplanetary communications and/or of
transferring data to/from surface deployed kiosks of interactive
audio/video and other science related instruments.

Eventually sending in a capable robotic rigid airship that could
essentially stay aloft for months on end would give us a terrific
interactive look-see at whatever the nighttime surface of Venus has to
offer, as to better realizing whomever or whatever calls Venus home. A
mix of radar and optical CCD imaging from an altitude of 25 km and of
utilizing such sensitive CCD imaging as 0.001 lux or better, whereas
each method being capable of delivering less than 1 m/pixel via radar
and less than 0.1 m/pixel via optical at perhaps 16 bits/pixel would
become downright sufficient, especially at not 10% the cost of our
continually orbiting and imaging upon Mars, and of otherwise we'd be
accomplishing all of this Venus exploration within a fraction of the
time as for getting whatever into such close observation mode.

Just because Venus is a touch too geologically hot for naked humans,
especially those of us that are still certified as being dumb and
dumber and thus easily snookered into being dumbfounded over just about
anything that represents change, doesn't mean the Venus locals or
visiting ETs as having been camping out couldn't be managing just fine
and dandy.
~

Nondisclosure/Taboo: in spite of evidence exclusions, it seems there's
been other life upon Venus
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator) as interactive
within the ME-L1/EM-L2 sweet-spot
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Proto-moons, Venus ETs, Earthly ETs plus a few other somewhat testy
topics by; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

.