Re: moon landings were a hoax-Prove It or shut up!

Matt Wiser, (MI5/NSA drivel included)
>Son, please explain to someone who takes astronauts (like I said earlier-have you even
>bothered to meet and talk with an astronaut? I have), NASA and other space agencies,
>JPL and similar institutions, and just any university's astronomy department seriously, why
>one should even consider your delusions.

BTW; why are your diverting back into your cloak and dagger spookology
borg mode of all in one paragraph story telling?

The regular laws of physics seem to more than back up my
observationology, as well as to my subjectively interpreting upon what
looks somewhat if not entirely artificial about Venus. Equally my focus
upon our moon seems to beg for the truth and nothing but the truth
which obviously isn't possible until your fat lady sings and them
Apollo cows come home.

BTW No.2;
I never suggested that ETs specifically moved an entire planet into our
solar sustem. Though I'd suppose if two solar systems were sufficiently
nearby one another, having a good Oort to Oort contest of wits and will
to survive, and if ETs could have taken advantage of that opportunity
as to improve upon the odds of safely transferring a planet and perhaps
sharing a spare moon or two over to our less testy solar system, then
I'd suppose it's possible that ETs had something to contribute that's
part of whom we are.

It's true that Venus is geologically hot (thereby not entirely
greenhouse hot) and otherwise somewhat humanly nasty to boot, which has
absolutely nothing to do with others as locals or perhaps ETs making a
go of it because, it's simply not too hot and nasty for applied physics
to survive, even on behalf of assisting other forms of local life as
having evolved in order to have survived in spite of our being so
continually dumbfounded. Venus wasn't always that hot and nasty,
whereas the craters we see simply didn't transpire after having to get
all the way through that much of a surrounding atmospheric ocean as for
defending the surface from all but the platinum class of meteors, which
may have existed, although 8~9 g/cm3 is most likely the sort of density
which would hardly have made a noticeable dent, much less a significant
crater after getting itself through that thick soup of the day.

Temperature and pressure are each relative to your frame of existence.
>>From the outside looking in upon Venus it's not such a nice place for
naked humans, such as is the same analogy applies for us humans looking
at the life thriving within our deep oceans isn't exactly reassuring as
for that wet and nasty environment sustaining our form of life as under
such lethal amounts of water, that which somewhat sucks because we've
humans have got to deal with the incest mutation likes of GW Bush and
the fish do not.

Besides failing to contribute as to resolving any good number of
issues, instead you're the one that's continually going out of your
less than godly ways and means as per excluding viable evidence and,
otherwise skewing even your own conditional laws of physics in order to
suit your pagan mainstream mindset of dastardly motives and hidden
agendas. I have no such ulterior motives nor hidden agenda, though what
I do have is a serious minion gap. How about yourself?

>Every model of solar system formation indicates that Venus formed in
>its orbit-so explain how an ET civilization could move a planet across
>the light-years.
Key words being "every model" should have given you a freaking clue
that we do NOT know all there is to know, but then you keep spouting
your intellectual buttology flatulence as though you do, or as though
those which your extremely brown nose favors know all there is to know.

>ET may be coming here, but I don't think they can move a planet...
I'll also agree that ETs may have been here and done just about
everything you and I can imagine, though I'll not exclude their
capability of influencing a given planet and/or that of a spare icy
proto-moon into being carefully diverted and/or gently maneuvered along
the way for the task of their good intentions of terraforming another
world. At least my super-computer that has all of three dyslexic
functioning brain cells to work with offers all sorts of viable models
that makes it entirely possible for contributions from the Sirius star
system to have merged (good or badly) along with our populations of
planets, moon and the billions of Kuiper/Oort zone items that have got
to be worth something to someone. Thus as for intentionally moving an
entire planet isn't exactly all that likely, although influencing it's
path as all of holy Oort zone hell breaks lose and the alignment of the
major items of gravity gets further involved seems perfectly doable.
I'm also not excluding pure happenstance of some holy crapshoot as
being a good part of the answer, although why would any ET worth their
salt ignore such an interesting opportunity as to share and share alike
as long as our two solar systems remained sufficiently near one
another?
~

In spite of an ongoing orchestrated status quo, it seems there's been
other life as coexisting upon Venus
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian and China's LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator) as
interactive within the ME-L1/EM-L2 sweet-spot
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Of many things Sirius, proto-moons, Venus, Earthly ETs & somewhat testy
topics by; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

.