Re: moon landings were a hoax-Prove It or shut up!

There's obviously damn good cloak and dagger reasons why our
MI5/NSA~NASA rusemasters haven't published squat worth of those as-is
natural color Kodak moments as obtained from Orbit
(http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/), whereas such
images are certainly of sufficiently true to life color and albedo, as
well as per their being obtained as near enough to the moon, typically
just a bit more than 100 km which represents along with a 10X telephoto
lens as accommodating 38,400 fold mafgnification and, as having been
applied on essentially that of an 8192 X 8192 pixle per B&W frame and
4096 X 4096 upon color film that was worth at least 256 bit
color/contrast depth that's easily offering us a look-see that's a good
100 fold better off than the best of whatever team KECK has to work
with as of today, and tht's well above whatever it should have taken
for quite nicely enlarging upon their Apollo landing sites, especially
since their CM had to have pasted multiple times directly over each of
those sites respectively upon each and every mission, that which did
not even require such as for those being manned as for their
accomplishing such images via orbiting the moon, although manned orbits
were certainly doable as humanly survivable though perhaps at an
elevated TBI factor that might suggest having been close to their
red-line of requiring banked bone marrow upon their return, especially
if they'd actually spent any EVA/moonsuit ***-naked time upon the
reactive surface.
~

Life on Venus, a Township, Bridge and ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

.