Re: Why was it cold in Apollo 13?

Jeff Findley,
As usual, I see that you and/or any of your collective of incest cloned
borgs can't afford to respond to my previous reply. That's too gosh
darn bad because, I seem to have lots more to share and share alike.

According to my piss poor math, at having to be roughly 110+km off the
deck, whereas if that were circular represents every 1.5 some odd hours
and otherwise as for actually their being elliptical of roughly 2 hours
as having their CSM passing directly over the supposed landing site(s),
often having a 10X telephoto opportunity of recording such upon high
resolution B&W as well as regular color emulsion film, whereas
achieving the 8192 x 8192 resolution per frame isn't exactly such bad
news photo-op situation when you further take into consideration the
256 or better bits worth of image information per given pixel
equivalence of what that film and lens were entirely capable of having
recorded, especially within the central portions of any given frame.

I'm essentially using the very same archives as I'd started out with
more than 6 years ago, yet those worshiping the ground and of the plies
of their own incest crapolla upon it that's 100% MI6/NSA~NASA/Apollo
seem to exclude any such reference to or of any other usage from such
official images.

Compared to the otherwise dark and nasty terrain that's somewhat of a
reddish/golden brown worth of iron, titanium as darkened with plain old
nasty carbon as having been deposited all about a relatively dark
amount of raw basalt that's responsible for the average 11~12% albedo,
isn't it just a wee bit odd that our reasonably large and quite shiny
white and/or of bright/polished aluminum worth of our LM that's
providing perhaps an albedo of better than 0.95 never once became
recorded as any cluster of bright pixels, nor even as one such
photographic grain, when in fact there actually should have been an
overload cluster worth of blooming/saturated grains and/or as scanned
into pixels as having been terribly over exposed. Instead we see only
upon what looks as fairly recent impact craters, showing us a somewhat
dark hole and surrounding substance (of at least several dozens if not
greater than hundreds of meters in diameter) of having exposed whatever
got uncovered that's of less than 0.05 worth of albedo, and I do
believe that's getting things to less than half of the average albedo,
or nearly coal black.

In places the Hadley rille is supposedly worth 1500 meters across, with
some of the narrow portions being near 1 km and otherwise worth 1.3 km
near the Apollo-15 landing/impact site. This gives us village idiots a
rough observationology perspective as to interpreting upon those nearby
recent looking impact like zones being of representing several hundred
meters worth, though as sharing nothing worthy of any brighter
illumination from the likes of any artificial items within the center
of those zones, that plus no apparent sign whatsoever of having any
down-range displacements (dusting off) of the lunar surface for
hundreds if not several kilometers, and I believe these images were
rather fresh, as in not more than a few hours after the supposed
touchdowns, with obviously having multiple opportunities of repeating
the look-see upon each pass. It's as though the orbiting portions of
photographing the moon was robotic, thus unable to interactively deal
appropriately with each of the 24+ passes over the landing site.

Oddly the MI5/NSA~MI6/NASA PR infomercial spooks are still not using
any of their absolutely terrific telephoto boosted resolution frames
from their very own official archives, and their SMART-1 version is
offering us absolutely pathetic resolution. Why is that?
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/

or take a brief consideration upon this somewhat perfectly natural
looking item?
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS15-84-11236

Here's some nifty telephoto resolution on B&W film from just the AS15
group. Though offering us way more than sufficient resolution, although
still not providing any sign of those Hadley rille frames as per giving
us a look-see at anything potentially Apollo-15 worthy. Apparently
whowever was in the CSM dirvers seat must have been using a barf-bag
while super-glued to the space-toilet each and every time that sucker
passed directly over their langing zone.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS15-95-12970
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS15-95-12964
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS15-95-12973
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS15-98-13332
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS15-98-13351
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS15-98-13300
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS15-92-12498
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS15-92-12497
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS15-92-12496
Going by other sequence images of a given landmark, it seems at least
two if not 3+ images of their landing site(s) could have been obtained
at 10X telephoto rsolution upon each pass, thus at least 48+ telephoto
image/frame opportunities per mission of the before and after landing
zone(s).

This batch of A-15 color frames has some w/ow spectrum filters,
although the AS8, AS11, AS12 and even AS16 color frames offer somewhat
more interesting and true to life colors to ponder, as are those from
each of the other missions that at least managed to robotically orbit
the moon.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?91

This one depicts a great deal of their typically 55+% lunar albedo as
having been derived off all of that non-reactive and non-electrostatic
composite of cornmeal and portland cement as such a nifty clumping thin
layer of moon-dirt, although you might perfer using 60~65% in this
instance with their LM offered such an ideal color and albedo
reflective basis. Obviously there are some other items of interest
about this image that downright suck, but then essentially all such
LM/EVA surface photos suck in more freaking ways than we can shake a
flaming stick at.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS15-87-11839

UV secondary/recoil reactive image ?
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS15-99-13410

For some reason this unfortunate Apollo-14 magazine-M includes one of
their PhotoShop star removal 'BLUE SCREEN' oops frames AS14-73-10182,
yet never once an inclusion of mother Earth or of the much brighter
though smaller observed orb of Venus. Obviously the color having been
shifted due to secondary/recoil radiation and just via having so much
extra near-blue as being generated by all the unfiltered UV doing
exactly what it does best.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?73


These sphere like domes suggest many potential geode pockets, as
potential safe habitats on behalf of some future mission that'll need
as much protection as they can possibly get, especially by day.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS12-56B-8298

Of course of what was supposedly obtained upon the surface is at risk
because, there's absolutely no way of explaining the various color/hue
shifts within the same magazine since their EVA/moonsuit deployed and
operated photographic equipment inventory didn't include, or could
their moonsuit impaired hands have manage any such optical filter
changes as for accommodating such options (the only optical filter was
of a pre-fit full spectrum band-pass of a polarised element), and
otherwise for some reason there's never anything depicted as per any
returning module arriving for their ride home because, there obviously
never was any such opportunity as to establish such Kodak moments.
You'd have to think, just in case things went terribly wrong, that Each
mission would have photographed their before and after landing site
with their 10X telephoto lens as recorded upon the fine resolution of
8192 x 8192 and 256+ bits/pixel worth of Kodak film, in the same as
they or a robotic camera would have obtained a few shots of their
moonsuited crew as arriving back from the lunar surface, say just prior
to their docking with the CSM. Matter of fact, there's any number of
things you'd think would have transpired as having been included as
additional Kodak moments because, there certainly wasn't any shortage
of film or cameras.

These official Apollo photographic archives are simply chuck full of
those entirely believable images as having been robotically obtained
from orbit, of a cosmic lunar morgue worth of horrific meteorites and
of their primary and secondary impact shards as having been covered
and/or surrounded by all of the carbon, iron and titanium dust mixed up
with all of the remains of broken and dark lunar basalt plus bedrock of
mostly basalt as having been Kodak photo-obtained from such a nearby
orbit, with the older, much larger and relatively shallow craters
suggesting those as having been ice upon ice impacts. While otherwise
these archives seem to be following the usual infomercial style of
damage-control process by doing their level best at wagging their
need-to-know dogs to death, excluding the little somewhat testy matter
of frying our first batch of astronauts in order to buy a little more
smoke-n-mirror time for our cloak-n-dagger wizards to make
something/anything work according to plan. Apparently it's just like
our current war(s) as per obtaining global energy domination, whereas
unless you died as a direct result of a formal battle, and from an
enemy bullet at that, your demise simply doesn't count.
~

Life on Venus, Township w/Bridge and ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
"In war there are no rules" - Brad Guth

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: MOON CONSPIRACY & HOAX: CHARLIE DUKE - Family Abuser, NEIL ARMSTRONG - Reclusive, GE
    ... achieving the 8192 x 8192 resolution per frame isn't exactly such bad ... reddish/golden brown worth of iron, titanium as darkened with plain old ... and I believe these images were ... This one depicts a great deal of their typically 55+% lunar albedo as ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Update images hi-res and other
    ... I have adjourned and assistant new images in middle-high ... resolution and to great field lunar and solar with a ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: scanning options for slide archival...
    ... really scan at maximum resolution and bit depth. ... limited subset of editing tools) but scan "raw". ... whether or not it's worth doing them all at max res. ... native resolution without using any of the scanner software editing ...
    (comp.periphs.scanners)
  • Re: Moon landings were a hoax
    ... The MI5/NSA~NASA rusemaster http://moon.google.com/ set of images ... need to be greatly contrasted up or at least their brightness greatly ... That 100 km advantage alone is worth 3,844:1 ... naked Kodak eye. ...
    (rec.aviation.military)
  • Re: Why was it cold in Apollo 13?
    ... at least half of their craft throughout most any time means nothing. ... How can you keep excluding the images from orbit that in no way are ... How can you keep excluding the secondary/recoil worth of radiation as ... We did not walk upon the moon. ...
    (sci.space.history)