Re: NASA and the Vision thing
- From: OM <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 18:11:20 -0600
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:39:50 +0100, "frogéric haessig"
<fhaessig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ribbited:
>The previous comment of OM, while rude, was not trolling.
....It was an accurate assessment of your excuse for a nation. Deal
with it.
>Changing his handle to get past a filter and using abusive language
>definitely is.
....Trolling? No, it's called taking your attitude and ramming it back
down your croakhole, Froggie. Had I *totally* obscured my ID - read:
removed the .sig - then you -might- have a case for trolling. In a
Frog's eye, perhaps.
>In fact, it may be beyond this.
"Plunk your magic twanger, Froggy! Let's see if we can run OM off of
..history by taunting him and calling him names!"
....More devious scum have tried, Frogeric. Do your worst.
I *dare* you.
OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NASA and the Vision thing
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: NASA and the Vision thing
- References:
- Re: NASA and the Vision thing
- From: OM
- Re: NASA and the Vision thing
- From: frédéric haessig
- Re: NASA and the Vision thing
- From: frédéric haessig non grata
- Re: NASA and the Vision thing
- From: frédéric haessig
- Re: NASA and the Vision thing
- Prev by Date: Re: CEV meets UFO
- Next by Date: Korolev's RT-1,2 missiles -- launch pads?
- Previous by thread: Re: NASA and the Vision thing
- Next by thread: Re: NASA and the Vision thing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
