Re: Apollo1 vs Apollo2
- From: "Rusty" <reuben_barton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 2 Dec 2005 13:46:26 -0800
Lorenzo Baldi wrote:
> Any thoughs about this article (and, of course, the complete .doc
> file)?
>
> http://www.spacedaily.com/news/lunar-05zzy.html
>
> Maybe it's not the program's biggest weakness, but I didn't realize
> how far they are from a real working project untill I read this
> paragraph:
>
> "And there is a technical problem with EOR+LOR that no one seems to
> have noticed: During the TLI and LOI burns, the CEV is docked
> nose-down with respect to the engines. The unfortunate astronauts
> will be hanging from their seat straps, taking the g-forces in the
> uncomfortable "eyeballs-out" position. Possibly the lunar CEV will
> have rotatable seats."
>
> Lorenzo
>
> Lorenzo Baldi
> E-Mail: lornioiz@xxxxxxxxx
> ICQ UIN: 4165096
>
>
I found this NASA solicitation for CEV models. NASA released a 16-mb,
37-page MS Word document. It has highly detailed and dimensioned
drawings of the CEV capsule, Lunar lander, CEV crew launcher and CEV
heavy lift vehicle.
16-mb MS Word Document with CEV model drawings
http://prod.nais.nasa.gov/eps/eps_data/118283-SOL-001-002.doc
NASA model solicitation page
http://prod.nais.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/eps/sol.cgi?acqid=118283
-Rusty
.
- Follow-Ups:
- LM1 vs LM2 (bleah...)
- From: Reed Snellenberger
- Re: Apollo1 vs Apollo2
- From: Rusty
- LM1 vs LM2 (bleah...)
- References:
- Apollo1 vs Apollo2
- From: Lorenzo Baldi
- Apollo1 vs Apollo2
- Prev by Date: Re: Apollo1 vs Apollo2
- Next by Date: Re: Apollo1 vs Apollo2
- Previous by thread: Re: Apollo1 vs Apollo2
- Next by thread: Re: Apollo1 vs Apollo2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|