Re: How many satellites are in geosynchronous orbit by now?
- From: Jonathan Silverlight <jsilverlight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 08:19:55 +0000
In message <1133935551.532512.212050@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stuf4 <tdadamemd-spamblock-@xxxxxxxxxx> writes
From Jim Davis:Stuf4 wrote:
>> Radar is not very useful up there -- the strength of a radar >> echo drops as the distance to the fourth power, barring some >> special cases. > > Actually, the strength of a radar echo drops as the inverse of > distance *squared*... > > But everyone probably knows what was meant!
No, Henry is correct. Power recieved / power transmitted is proportional to 1 / (range**4).
My feedback was offered in the interest of careful wording. It's easy to have a perfectly accurate thought, but then put that thought into words that are completely inaccurate.
It's even easier to express an inaccurate thought, and it's often better not to express a thought..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- How many satellites are in geosynchronous orbit by now?
- From: Soren Kuula
- Re: How many satellites are in geosynchronous orbit by now?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: How many satellites are in geosynchronous orbit by now?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: How many satellites are in geosynchronous orbit by now?
- From: Soren Kuula
- Re: How many satellites are in geosynchronous orbit by now?
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: How many satellites are in geosynchronous orbit by now?
- From: Stuf4
- Re: How many satellites are in geosynchronous orbit by now?
- From: Jim Davis
- Re: How many satellites are in geosynchronous orbit by now?
- From: Stuf4
- How many satellites are in geosynchronous orbit by now?
- Prev by Date: Re: The greatest failure of space exploration
- Next by Date: Re: Gees Louise! GOOGLE/NOVA/NASA = MI6/NSA~CIA
- Previous by thread: Re: How many satellites are in geosynchronous orbit by now?
- Next by thread: Re: How many satellites are in geosynchronous orbit by now?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|