Re: Moon Hoax people
- From: "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" <mooregr_deleteth1s@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:40:32 GMT
<Secret237@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1134841570.575379.272970@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Brad wrote:
>
> <<There is no hard science that we nor have the USSR or has Japan
> managed
> to get a soft-landing of so much as a science probe upon the moon. >>
>
> What about the Laser reflectors that were left on the Moon by the
> Apollo astronauts ?? Surely they had to land softly.
Yes,but unfortunately that doesn't really help. Remember, we soft-landed a
couple of Surveyors and the Russians soft-landed at least one laer
reflector.
> You yourself can
> even use them if you would like, they are there.
Unless he's got a very powerful laser AND telescope, he can use them, but
unlikely to get any results.
In any event, unfortunately the above isn't a strong argument for us landing
on the Moon.
Fortunately there is far stronger evidence.
>I WOULD say that this
> is the hard science you are looking for.
>
> Brad also wrote :
> <<Your world is chuck full of bigotry, >>
>
> I saw no bigotry in Scott Hedrick's post; I only see it in yours Brad.
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moon Hoax people
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: Moon Hoax people
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: Moon Hoax people
- From: Secret237
- Re: Moon Hoax people
- References:
- Moon Hoax people
- From: Secret237
- Re: Moon Hoax people
- From: looter92
- Re: Moon Hoax people
- From: Scott Hedrick
- Re: Moon Hoax people
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: Moon Hoax people
- From: Secret237
- Moon Hoax people
- Prev by Date: Re: SpaceX NOT First Kwaj orbital launch
- Next by Date: Re: Moon Hoax people
- Previous by thread: Re: Moon Hoax people
- Next by thread: Re: Moon Hoax people
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|