Re: Moon Hoax people

Greg D. Moore (Strider),
>Yes, but unfortunately that doesn't really help. Remember,
>we soft-landed a couple of Surveyors and the Russians
>soft-landed at least one laer reflector.
Where's all the supposed hard-science and thus proof-positive?
Where's the R&D of trial and error prototype fly-by-rocket landers?

As far as I've located, it seems as though Russia has absolutely
nothing to share or much less brag about, as neither does our NASA have
anything to show us that's worthy of any demonstration. At best, only
remote science via orbit, plus we get their science of impact. There
have been no live or still images obtained from the surface of the
moon, not then, not from anything Apollo, and not ever since. We still
can't manage to get so much as an empty beer can safely deployed on to
the moon, much less if it's containing beer.

Considering the nasty amount of secondary/recoil photons to deal with,
just orbiting from a good distance gets real testy while cruising over
the sunny side. The lunar IR albedo is greater than 25%, thus extra a
little heat to deal with while in space. A full earthshine landing
would have been sufficiently illuminated upon by nearly 50 lux (50
lumen/m2 = 50e28 photons/s), obviously a bit on the cold side but
otherwise much less contributing of hard-X-rays, yet still having been
damn risky business.

Kodak film really doesn't like being summarily roasted and then TBI to
death from all of the secondary/recoil photons of hard-X-rays. Kodak
film as for being optically unfiltered would also have recorded far
more than the human eye can see, especially more of the deep-violet,
near-UV and UV-a spectrums. Kodak film should have quite easily
recorded a couple of other planets besides Earth, and the Sirius star
system is simply another given. The dynamic range(DR) of film simply
isn't that bad, even if giving us a thermally damaged limitation of
512:1, of which considering the relatively low angle of sunlight making
the down-range (meaning as looking away from the sun) photographic
albedo value of the dark brownish lunar surface somewhere within the
1~2% range, combine that with the polarised filter and as such there's
hardly any surface reflected photons to start with.

Here's some good and perfectly believable shots of our fully
illuminated moon from orbit, showing of all silly things, good old
Earth along with the extremely dark albedo of our moon. Take most any
image; such as AS11-44-6554, AS11-44-6639 or AS11-44-6648 and go
figure.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?44

>Secret...@xxxxxxxxxxx
>Yes, fortunately there is stronger evidence that we landed humans on
>the Moon, but it seems Brad has decided not to argue that at this time.
This statement makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, especially since
I've done nothing but argue as based entirely upon hard-science and the
regular laws of physics. It seems that you're the one excluding
hard-scientific evidence at the drop of another mainstream status quo
infomercial hat. Exactly what's your LLPOF point?
-

I've noticed as of lately, that a number of these incest cloned and
otherwise extremely brown-nosed and thereby ***-sucking borg
collectives of Usenet and ISP spooks, and most specifically of this
GOOGLE/NOVA/NASA disinformation cesspool of topic/author stalking Aryan
species of brown-noses have been into using a bit more than their fair
share of their boss's spermware/malware (aka MI6/NSA~CIA Third Reich PC
fuckware), as per getting right back into their usual space-toilet
modes of perpetrating MOS nasty sorts of cold-war tricks. So, I guess
that I'll just have to keep improving upon my fishing hooks while doing
my level best at returning their own warm and fuzzy flak along with as
much love and affection as I can muster.
-

"If you're not looking for the truth, you will not find it."
-Brad Guth

"To believe with certainty we must begin with doubting."
-Stanislaus I

"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes,
but having new eyes."
-Marcel Proust

"Truth is given, not to be contemplated, but to be done. Life is an
action, not a thought."
-F.W. Robertson
~

Kurt Vonnegut would have to agree far beyond; WAR is WAR, thus "in war
there are no rules" - In fact, war has been the very reason of honest
folks having to deal with the likes of others that haven't been playing
by whatever the supposed rules, such as our resident warlord(GW Bush).
Life upon Venus, a township w/Bridge & ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

.