Re: Is Virgin Galactic for Real?
- From: Bruce Hoult <bruce@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:30:11 +1300
In article <0001HW.BFE5B009009347F9F0284550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Herb Schaltegger <herb.schaltegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Because even supplemental oxygen doesn't result in high-enough ppO2 in
> the lungs to make enough of a difference. Kind of why those stupid
> drop-down Dixie Cup masks don't matter much in an airliner accident at
> full cruising altitude.
It seems to be fine below 30,000 ft, if you're not exerting yourself
e.g. flying a glider. Everest is below 30,000 ft, but I'm prepared to
believe that it may well not be enough if you're walking and climbing.
--
Bruce | 41.1670S | \ spoken | -+-
Hoult | 174.8263E | /\ here. | ----------O----------
.
- References:
- Is Virgin Galactic for Real?
- From: Von Fourche
- Re: Is Virgin Galactic for Real?
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Is Virgin Galactic for Real?
- From: Brian Heil
- Re: Is Virgin Galactic for Real?
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Is Virgin Galactic for Real?
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: Is Virgin Galactic for Real?
- From: Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
- Re: Is Virgin Galactic for Real?
- From: Russell Wallace
- Re: Is Virgin Galactic for Real?
- From: Herb Schaltegger
- Is Virgin Galactic for Real?
- Prev by Date: Re: Record Set for Space Laser Communication
- Next by Date: Re: hyperdrive?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Virgin Galactic for Real?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Virgin Galactic for Real?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|