Re: NASA HONORS LEGENDARY ASTRONAUT VANCE BRAND
- From: Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:55:22 -0600
Jorge R. Frank wrote:
Freedom was designed to be a lot more autonomous than ISS turned out to be, mainly because the assembly sequence called for it to be man-tended until assembly complete. When the Russians joined ISS and permanent-manned capability moved much earlier in the assembly sequence, a lot of that autonomy was sacrificed since there was assumed to be a crew there.
That's fine as far as it goes, but what about orbital decay?
Pat .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NASA HONORS LEGENDARY ASTRONAUT VANCE BRAND
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: NASA HONORS LEGENDARY ASTRONAUT VANCE BRAND
- References:
- Re: NASA HONORS LEGENDARY ASTRONAUT VANCE BRAND
- From: OM
- Re: NASA HONORS LEGENDARY ASTRONAUT VANCE BRAND
- From: Jim Oberg
- Re: NASA HONORS LEGENDARY ASTRONAUT VANCE BRAND
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: NASA HONORS LEGENDARY ASTRONAUT VANCE BRAND
- From: Herb Schaltegger
- Re: NASA HONORS LEGENDARY ASTRONAUT VANCE BRAND
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: NASA HONORS LEGENDARY ASTRONAUT VANCE BRAND
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: NASA HONORS LEGENDARY ASTRONAUT VANCE BRAND
- Prev by Date: Re: NASA HONORS LEGENDARY ASTRONAUT VANCE BRAND
- Next by Date: Re: Proper commemoration of Challenger Disaster
- Previous by thread: Re: NASA HONORS LEGENDARY ASTRONAUT VANCE BRAND
- Next by thread: Re: NASA HONORS LEGENDARY ASTRONAUT VANCE BRAND
- Index(es):