Re: SSME vs. J2 / RS-68

From: Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 18:10:56 -0600

landings.geo@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Any thoughts on the proposed possible engine changes to the proposed
HLV?

URL: http://tinyurl.com/omhpx

I assumed due to its non-reuseable design nature the RS-68 would make a better choice.
SSME's are wonderfully efficient engines, but they ain't cheap.

Pat
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SSME vs. J2 / RS-68
  - From: Scott Lowther

References:
- SSME vs. J2 / RS-68
  - From: landings . geo

Prev by Date: Re: SSME vs. J2 / RS-68
Next by Date: Re: Mark Your Calendar (was Re: Goddard's 80th Anniversary and.... nothing?)
Previous by thread: Re: SSME vs. J2 / RS-68
Next by thread: Re: SSME vs. J2 / RS-68
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread