Re: Retained LM ascent stage
- From: henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Henry Spencer)
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:31:52 GMT
In article <1146186788.862554.128570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
John Charles <johnbcharles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But you raise an interesting question: why was the EVA done after TEI
and not before it, still in lunar orbit?
Don't think I've ever seen this addressed. However, I think I can guess.
In terms of the spacewalk itself, there's no obvious reason to prefer one
time or the other. But there's plenty of time between TEI and reentry
when the crew don't really have a lot to do, so that's the obvious time.
To make time for it in lunar orbit, you'd either have to end science
operations early, or delay TEI.
Moreover, doing it in lunar orbit would insert a complicated procedure,
which expends a lot of time, effort, and oxygen, *before* a critical
maneuver. Better to do the absolutely-vital maneuver first, and then,
when that's successfully completed and assorted contingency plans are no
longer needed, look after the desirable-but-not-essential spacewalk.
--
spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer
mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Retained LM ascent stage
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: Retained LM ascent stage
- References:
- Retained LM ascent stage
- From: John Charles
- Re: Retained LM ascent stage
- From: John Charles
- Retained LM ascent stage
- Prev by Date: Re: Vanguard-1 blow-up televised live?
- Next by Date: Re: Retained LM ascent stage
- Previous by thread: Re: Retained LM ascent stage
- Next by thread: Re: Retained LM ascent stage
- Index(es):