Re: Saturn V
- From: columbiaaccidentinvestigation@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 24 May 2006 21:09:48 -0700
polite?
"As it is, it's useless for Usenet"snip
Your ignorance is demonstrated by the following reckless statement
"And losing seven astronauts in a Shuttle accident wouldn't put a crimpsnip
in Shuttle flights if we were rational about it."
I doubt you took the time to understand the information posted, but
instead reacted emotionally by posting a reply not even acknowledging
the point at hand. My post is providing the links and sources, giving
you plenty of information for your own knowledge, and verification. I
have found this information quite helpful and thought you might find it
helpful as well. But a pretentious statement claiming an executive
summary is necessary for your understanding in the matter of space
craft safety is quite childish, and deserved to be called out. So you
can cure your own ignorance, or cling to it the choice is yours.
.
- References:
- Re: Saturn V
- From: Neil Gerace
- Re: Saturn V
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Saturn V
- From: Hyper
- Re: Saturn V
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Saturn V
- From: Hyper
- Re: Saturn V
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Saturn V
- From: columbiaaccidentinvestigation
- Re: Saturn V
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Saturn V
- From: columbiaaccidentinvestigation
- Re: Saturn V
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Saturn V
- Prev by Date: Re: Saturn V
- Next by Date: Re: NASA goes with RS-68
- Previous by thread: Re: Saturn V
- Next by thread: Re: Saturn V
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|