Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogra
- From: fairwater@xxxxxxxxx (Derek Lyons)
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:11:19 GMT
Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dave Michelson wrote:
The so-called space laboratory sure looks small. The CM looks huge by
comparison.
I would love to know the details on this one...the lab is supposed to be
_inflatable_ in some way.
It's doubtful that there _are_ many details. NASA's habit of
generating fanciful concepts from whole cloth goes *way* back.
D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.
-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogra
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogra
- From: Malcolm Bacchus
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogra
- From: Dale
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogra
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogra
- From: OM
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogra
- From: Dave Michelson
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogra
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogra
- Prev by Date: Re: If the moon landing was faked...
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Pat's answer to Trident obsolesence
- Previous by thread: Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogra
- Next by thread: Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogra
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|