Re: Identifying objects in Buzz's faceplate.
- From: "Brad Guth" <bradguth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:47:15 +0000 (UTC)
"Ami Silberman" <silber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eavr32$559$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Anyone who doesn't think they are studio lights is welcome to help out with
identifying them.
It's simply not the gamma and hard-X-ray reactive moon, and the lighting
spectrum is very Xenon lamp worthy since there's hardly a speck if any
UV-a to deal with, and that Kodak film did have sufficient DR capability
to have recorded Venus plus a few other unavoidable items besides mother
Earth, especially as of A-11, A-14 and A-16 where Venus was clearly
above the lunar horizon and/or nearby Earth (depicted as somewhat below
Earth's orbit), whereas any solar system simulator worth it's salt
should have proven this in more ways than necessary.
Lets say that I certainly can't prove it wasn't studio lighting,
especially if the camera and lens were without spectrum bandpass or
having other essential near-UV and especially UV-c spectrum cut-off
filters.
If you'd like, I'll specify the sorts of filters that should have been
demanded for that sensitive Kodak Ektachrome film, that would have
otherwise unavoidably recorded far more than the human eye sees.
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
- References:
- Identifying objects in Buzz's faceplate.
- From: Ami Silberman
- Identifying objects in Buzz's faceplate.
- Prev by Date: Identifying objects in Buzz's faceplate.
- Next by Date: Re: A tour group just returned from Baykonur with great photos
- Previous by thread: Identifying objects in Buzz's faceplate.
- Next by thread: Re: Identifying objects in Buzz's faceplate.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
