Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91

I'm sorry folks, but that life of such supposed all-knowing expertise
and otherwise good fortune as to having tagged our magnetosphere and of
the horrific radiation within, was of no great loss to modern science
nor humanity, whereas James Van Allen was yet another entirely bought
and paid for soul, as well as being a typical born-again minion/puppet,
as having been entirely orchestrated (AKA made for TV) infomercial that
required the name of a real person in order to accommodate whatever the
mainstream status quo and their ruse of the century had established
within their mindset, which obviously included his part in the ongoing
effort of sustaining our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s) until hell
freezes over or them NASA/Apollo cows come home. Another portion of the
truth has once again gone into yet another grave, just the way
MI/NSA~NASA likes it.

Our naked and physically dark moon is simply unavoidably at least ten
fold if not 100+ fold worse off than any GSO environment that's smack in
some of the worse TBI Van Allen badlands that our magnetosphere has to
offer. James Van Allen was never of any help, nor can the physics or
hard-science be extracted from anything associated with his name.

Just try as you may at getting specific Van Allen bet density or
attenuation numbers, especially as to most any given spectrum of lethal
solar/cosmic radiation that's getting through those Van Allen belts.
Good luck.

For something that's supposedly so life essential, as in representing
itself as to sustaining of Earth's protective atmosphere and otherwise
further shielding us from some of the worse kinds of DNA trauma, we
actually know next to nothing about our badly failing magnetosphere and
of those Van Allen belts within. Why is that?

According to every available solar system simulator (of which our NASA
and of those sucking up to their infomercial ***, whereas their having
the very best of such simulators to work with), missions A-11, A-14 and
A-16 each had unobstructed views of Venus as being above that physically
dark lunar horizon, and otherwise having at least once been situated as
though right next to and/or just below mother Earth, whereas even though
appearing as the much smaller item than Earth, it was in fact
unavoidably a brighter than Earth item that would have been rather
easily recorded as within an official EVA Kodak moment, especially of
any unfiltered Kodak moments as recorded upon the likes of their
Ektachrome film that was if anything rather sensitive to the bluish,
violet, near-UV and even a touch of having recorded into UV-a, as
photographing spectrums of light which the 0.75~0.80 reflective albedo
of Venus more than represented. Therefore, if anything that's true and
of fully replicated science about the photographic process and of
following the regular laws of physics, it is that Venus would have
photographed as even brighter yet than merely viewed by the human eye.

Yet never once from the lunar surface or as from orbit had there ever
been any sign of Venus, or for that matter of anything other than Earth.
Therefore our NASA/Apollo wizards are in fact born-again liars, as in
big time liars and so much worse. Van Allen was a team player, and
that's about all he ever was.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.