Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- From: fairwater@xxxxxxxxx (Derek Lyons)
- Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 07:24:02 GMT
lou@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
So while the the Apollo/Surveyor/Lunakhod comparison is interesting, I
don't think you can use it to show that manned missions will always be
better from a science/$ viewpoint.
A useful comparison is deep ocean research - for every Alvin there is
ten unmanned platforms. Despite multiple attempts, manned exploration
has almost always taken a back seat - and much useful science is
accomplished without them.
D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.
-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- From: Proponent
- Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- References:
- Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- From: Rusty
- Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- From: lou
- Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- Prev by Date: Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- Next by Date: Nova and other heavy lift concepts - PDF files
- Previous by thread: Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- Next by thread: Re: Physicist James Van Allen Dies at 91
- Index(es):