Re: SeaDragon and the Soviet N1
- From: Monte Davis <monte.davis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:22:50 GMT
simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg) wrote:
All same-same for high-flight-rate RLVs.
Those are much more scalable (if properly designed) than heavy
lifters, by definition.
If your RLV has so low a payload fraction that it only pays off with
more flights than anyone wants...
And/or if your RLV cost so much to develop that ROI can only be
achieved with more flights than anyone wants...
You're just as dead, economically, as if you had Sea Dragons sitting
around with more heavy-lift capacity than anyone wants.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SeaDragon and the Soviet N1
- From: SENECA
- Re: SeaDragon and the Soviet N1
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: SeaDragon and the Soviet N1
- References:
- SeaDragon and the Soviet N1
- From: SENECA
- Re: SeaDragon and the Soviet N1
- From: Rusty
- Re: SeaDragon and the Soviet N1
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: SeaDragon and the Soviet N1
- From: Monte Davis
- Re: SeaDragon and the Soviet N1
- From: Rand Simberg
- SeaDragon and the Soviet N1
- Prev by Date: Re: Explorer 1 questions
- Next by Date: Re: Pluto's OK
- Previous by thread: Re: SeaDragon and the Soviet N1
- Next by thread: Re: SeaDragon and the Soviet N1
- Index(es):