Re: Pluto's OK
- From: "Ami Silberman" <silber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:58:54 -0400
"Eric Chomko" <pne.chomko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1156872969.608683.136810@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Only within the "fair use" doctrine, which specifically states that you
Rand Simberg wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:38:49 -0400, in a place far, far away,
"jonathan" <Write@xxxxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:
You can 'publish' anything you like on a personal blog.
Unless you're making money off of it, anything goes.
And unless they have it behind a credit card or such
...anything goes. If they're not making money off it
anything goes.
Nonsense. You can't violate someone's copyright, and give away
someone else's intellectual property for free.
For teaching purposes and if you carry on the copyright you can. Only
if the original poster states that no part can published in whole in
part without their blessing, etc. copyright means you CAN use it.
Eric
can't use the whole thing, or even large chunks.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pluto's OK
- From: Herb Schaltegger
- Re: Pluto's OK
- References:
- Pluto's OK
- From: Gareth Slee
- Re: Pluto's OK
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Pluto's OK
- From: jonathan
- Re: Pluto's OK
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Pluto's OK
- From: Eric Chomko
- Pluto's OK
- Prev by Date: Re: OT - TSA bans gels, liquids at aircraft museums
- Next by Date: Re: OT - TSA bans gels, liquids at aircraft museums
- Previous by thread: Re: Pluto's OK
- Next by thread: Re: Pluto's OK
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|