Re: Pluto's OK
- From: Herb Schaltegger <herb.schaltegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:40:57 -0500
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:04:47 -0500, Scott Hedrick wrote
(in article <bK3Jg.15183$y7.2012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
The burden to keep track of the copyright owner should be on the owner- if a
copyright changes ownership, that change should be registered within a very
limited period of time, or it legally becomes orphan until registered.
And such a safe-harbor/re-registration system should be a VERY limited
time. I'd vote for 90 days myself, which is longer than most time
limits in many legal procedures, but I'd be okay with 180 days.
--
"Fame may be fleeting but obscurity is forever." ~Anonymous
"I believe as little as possible and know as much as I can."
~Todd Stuart Phillips
<www.angryherb.net>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pluto's OK
- From: Scott Hedrick
- Re: Pluto's OK
- References:
- Pluto's OK
- From: Gareth Slee
- Re: Pluto's OK
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Pluto's OK
- From: jonathan
- Re: Pluto's OK
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Pluto's OK
- From: Eric Chomko
- Re: Pluto's OK
- From: Ami Silberman
- Re: Pluto's OK
- From: Herb Schaltegger
- Re: Pluto's OK
- From: Ami Silberman
- Re: Pluto's OK
- From: Scott Hedrick
- Pluto's OK
- Prev by Date: Re: NASA looking at backup, twin SRB, CLV design
- Next by Date: Re: Apollos 4 & 6 mission profiles
- Previous by thread: Re: Pluto's OK
- Next by thread: Re: Pluto's OK
- Index(es):