Re: New Russian space station?
- From: "Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:55:49 -0500
mike flugennock <flvg3nn0zk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:c975a$44f71d5f$4366619c$28365@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Pat Flannery wrote:
Comrades! And this one well be in a higher inclination orbit!
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Russia_Mulls_New_Space_Station_And_M
issions_To_The_Moon_And_Mars_999.html
_Dismantled_?? In..._2015_? Cripes, when's that damn' Erector set
supposed to be finished again...?
It's a mistranslation.
<http://www.friends-partners.org/pipermail/fpspace/2006-August/020813.html>
I like the bold originality of the mission: "the new space station
would be used to produce materials that are impossible to manufacture
on Earth and to improve the methods of remote monitoring of the
Earth."
Remote monitoring can be better done unmanned; materials processing can be
done on ISS.
This is a fairly obvious bluff; their rationale is transparently bogus.
--
JRF
Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: RIP: Rocco Petrone
- Next by Date: Re: Woomera chosen as launch site for ISS resupply
- Previous by thread: Re: New Russian space station?
- Next by thread: Re: Galileo antennae article
- Index(es):