Re: No ice on Moon?
- From: Dale <drc@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:06:56 -0700
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 04:02:20 GMT, henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Henry Spencer) wrote:
My personal opinion is that the Moon is likely to be more of interest as
an object of scientific study and as a mining base than as a place for
colonies. Except possibly in the very short term, there are better places
to put colonies.
Sadly lazy question, as I suspect you've already made it known, but
what places do you have in mind?
Dale
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No ice on Moon?
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: No ice on Moon?
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: No ice on Moon?
- References:
- No ice on Moon?
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: No ice on Moon?
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: No ice on Moon?
- From: jonathan
- Re: No ice on Moon?
- From: Henry Spencer
- No ice on Moon?
- Prev by Date: Re: No ice on Moon?
- Next by Date: OT- the state of the union
- Previous by thread: Re: No ice on Moon?
- Next by thread: Re: No ice on Moon?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|