Re: NASA Encounters Problems With Ares 1 Launch Vehicle Design



From: Rusty
According to discussions on Nasaspaceflight.com the Ares 1 is
in trouble:
--The CEV will have to use its Service Module engine as a 3rd stage.
The CEV service module will have to add 1000fps to achieve orbital
velocity on a mission to the ISS.
--The Ares 1 payload weight is down to 22 m-tons.

I believe that actually sounds about right, though perhaps minus another
couple of metric tonnes for incorporating their final safety features
and/or of fuel reserves and you're down to perhaps a working 21 if not a
wussy 20 tonne payload for merely achieving ISS, which is essentially
about what I'd said a good year ago.

"rocket/payload ratio of 42:1"

Of course, silly me, this only makes some of us village idiots wonder as
to how the heck that nearly 30% inert mass of the Saturn 5 managed
getting nearly 50t into orbiting the moon, and so quickly within a 60:1
rocket/payload ratio, as well as having extra payload and/or fuel to
burn none the less.

Ares-I Rocket concept started itself out at deploying 25 tonnes into
LEO/ISS with supposedly a safety margin of fuel to spare. Now it's down
to 22 tonnes and they're not even close to a solid prototype with any
proven certainty (they can't even specify as to it's final GLOW or of
whatever's inert mass, much less along with incorporating a good LES
configuration should all hell bust lose.

Perhaps they can utilize their LES itself as a third stage puller rather
than having to pack along an extra kicker.

Supposedly they're stuck within a 900t or somewhat less of a GLOW
window, as representing a somewhat pesky situation that may require a
little something extra in the way of their having to utilize spendy
composites and/or ductaping a couple of extra SRBs on for good measure.

Too bad they're still not smart enough to be using LRBs of h2o2/c3h4o or
perhaps better yet h2o2/Al instead of those somewhat inefficient SRBs.
Where the heck are those smart Jewish Third Reich rocket scientists when
you need them?
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: NASAs Ares I - The Stick is not big enough
    ... velocity on a mission to the ISS. ... features and/or of fuel reserves and you're down to perhaps a working 21 ... Ares-I Rocket concept started itself out at deploying 25 tonnes into ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: antimatter rockets
    ... Doesn't paint an attractive picture for pure matter-antimatter rocket. ... With a 50:1 thrust to weight, this rocket masses 2 metric tons. ... propellant fraction is 59.34% - this translates to 43.9 tonnes. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Hydrogen Cars, Trucks, and Buses Are the Answer Indeed
    ... A heavier tank subtracts from the payload, but lighter fuel load adds ... Tank Weight: 1% fuel weight ... Struct: 113.8 tonnes ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • This months popular science - hydrogen powered hyper jet
    ... The Concorde was a Mach 2,2 passenger jet that carried 100 passengers ... tonnes - total weight ... Each tonne of jet fuel has 43.8 GJ of thermal energy. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: Now the UK Has its own date in the history of al quiada attacks
    ... each american generates 20.1 metric tonnes of CO2 per year. ... Had the USA implemented Kyoto at the time it was signed, ... it isn't just the fuel you purchase at the fuel ... It is also all the energy that went into building your tank, ...
    (comp.os.vms)