Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- From: henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Henry Spencer)
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 18:34:16 GMT
In article <12mk7llivg0f22d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mercury had a secondary hatch at it's apex for the astronaut to use in
an emergency if the capsule landed off course with no naval support in
sight, like happened to Carpenter. I don't know if Gemini had some sort
of similar hatch in case the capsule didn't swing over the the
horizontal position for landing...
I *think* the reentry RCS and other equipment precluded this on Gemini.
Remember that for Gemini, the answer to almost any "it's not working"
situation during landing was "eject".
--
spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer
mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- From: OM
- Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- References:
- Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- From: PP
- Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- From: Dale
- Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- From: Pat Flannery
- Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- Next by Date: Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- Next by thread: Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|