Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- From: henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Henry Spencer)
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:34:14 GMT
In article <12mk4ve42sm2862@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Although the ejection seats are always associated with Gemini, the
spacecraft had two escape systems; once altitudes and speeds were
reached that made the seats unusable, the spacecraft could be separated
from the vehicle by firing all four of its retrorockets
simultaneously...
If memory serves, that option wasn't available on Gemini proper -- it was
added for MOL, where the presence of two big Roman candles :-) down below
made it imperative to have some way of getting clear of a malfunctioning
booster rather than just riding it out.
--
spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer
mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- From: Dave Michelson
- Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- References:
- Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- From: PP
- Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- From: Dave Michelson
- Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- From: Dale
- Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- From: Pat Flannery
- Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- Prev by Date: Re: Ares V to require construction of a new "super crawler"?
- Next by Date: Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- Next by thread: Re: Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|