Re: Still flying at 71
- From: Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:22:02 -0600
Fox2 wrote:
That 1927 plane pre-dates the Junkers by 9 years. I wonder if it is as noisy
inside as that JU-52 was.
Junkers claimed the corrugated wing didn't add drag; after hearing this once too often somebody stuck a corrugated wing section into a wind tunnel to see what would happen; the corrugated wing had around 40% more drag than a smooth wing.
Eric Brown compared starting the Ju-52's engines to trying to play a Wurlitzer organ; he was astounded that such a simple aircraft could such a confused and complicated cockpit. :-)
Pat
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Still flying at 71
- From: Fox2
- Re: Still flying at 71
- References:
- Still flying at 71
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Still flying at 71
- From: Fox2
- Re: Still flying at 71
- From: kmmposting
- Re: Still flying at 71
- From: Fox2
- Still flying at 71
- Prev by Date: Re: Still flying at 71
- Next by Date: Re: DR. VELIKOVSKY, the Floor is Your's!
- Previous by thread: Re: Still flying at 71
- Next by thread: Re: Still flying at 71
- Index(es):