Re: Bye-bye INF treaty?

On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:59:07 -0600, Herb Schaltegger
<herb.schaltegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:31:48 -0600, Greg D. Moore \(Strider\) wrote
(in article <oRoDh.5441$Jl.3262@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):

True, any argument can be made if you snipped the context.

Reason for cautious optimism? What, you're joking right? Let's see, more
helicopters are being targetted. And now they using poor man's chemical
weapons. That's an improvement?

Worse than that, they've discovered how to make shaped-charges quickly and
cheaply and are using them to great effect against up-armored Humvees and
trucks.

Personally, I think the up-armored Humvees are a mistake. I think they
should be using Bradly and similar APCs, and let the Humvee be the
jeep it was meant to be.

.