Re: Real Moon structure photographed by Zond 6 in 1968

On 12 Mar, 18:47, Pat Flannery <flan...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sir Code Cracker wrote:

Personally, I don't think they have been totally faked, but at least
in part maybe they have.

No.

Do you know it for sure or that "No" is only your modest opinion?

I grew up in the space age (born 1956) and they were not faked.
Consider this: if you make a VHS tape or DVD about how project Apollo
_wasn't_ faked, you will have very modest sales, and have to spend a lot
of time on research.
If, on the other hand, you just make up a bunch of crap about it being
fake, then suddenly you not only are the center of attention, but you
can sell your product hand-over-fist to the gullible and make a fortune.
Since you don't have to do any research to make things up, you can
produce your product for almost zero cost, while selling it at around
$20.00 per item; So, if after production and shipping you still make
around $15.00 per copy, you can clean up mighty good if even one in one
in ten thousand people buy it.
In fact, in the U.S. with 300 million people that equals 30,000 x 15 =
$450,000.
Money like that can tempt people to tell fibs. :-)

pat

Yes, it maybe true what you say, probably it is. Actually, I don't
know what to believe about the manned Moon missions. That's because I
have never seen anything that proves 100% that they happened actually
as we were told and shown. I mean, people were watching Armstrong on
the Moon in TV. How can one be so sure that those images were really
coming from the Moon?

It is the same as to say "How may I be sure that the Moon missions
were faked". How can I be sure?

So: if I can't be sure about any of the two theories, what happen? It
happens that I have a doubt, and so i want to learn more in order to
eliminate that doubt, in favor of the truth. Not in favor of the
theory I like most. But in favor of the truth, whatever it is, even if
I wouldn't like it.

Does this make sense?

.