Re: Real Moon structure photographed by Zond 6 in 1968

On 12 Mar 2007 14:23:07 -0700, in a place far, far away, "Sir Code
Cracker" <code_cracker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:

On 12 Mar, 22:10, simberg.interglo...@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg) wrote:
On 12 Mar 2007 13:53:32 -0700, in a place far, far away, "Sir Code
Cracker" <code_crac...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:

Money like that can tempt people to tell fibs. :-)

pat

Yes, it maybe true what you say, probably it is. Actually, I don't
know what to believe about the manned Moon missions. That's because I
have never seen anything that proves 100% that they happened actually
as we were told and shown.

It's not possible to do such a thing. If you think that things other
than mathematical theorems can be proved 100%, then you don't
understand anything about science, or logic.

False! Things can mostly be proven 100% with a simple scientific
method.

No. As I said, you reveal your ignorance of the scientific method.
Science proves nothing. It only disproves things. The theories that
are disprovable, but haven't been disproved, are the ones accepted.

Regarding the Apollo 11 Moon mission, they could and should
have offered to the taxpayers more and better evidence other than a
stupid, low quality TV transmission that looked like a Charlie Chaplin
movie from the beginning of his career.

That's the best that the technology of the time was capable of
providing.

Sorry.

If they wanted to fake it, the television images would have been much
better, because they wouldn't have had to broadcast them from the
surface of the moon.

Things can only be *disproved*, not "proved." The moon-hoax theorists
have been struggling to disprove the moon landings for decades. Their
"disproofs" always turn out to be bogus, based on a lack of
understanding of basic optics and basic physics. Many of them, like
Guth, are mentally ill.

Possible, but not proved.

Again, nothing can be proved. That Brad Guth is mentally ill is the
best theory that fits the facts (i.e., all his posts).

Not to mention a lack of understanding of human nature. Why would the
Soviet Union have allowed us to get away with a fake "win" of the
Space Race?

Because probably they just didn't care? ;-)

Then you understand nothing about history, either.
.

Relevant Pages