Re: USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with 'no return ticket'
- From: Herb Schaltegger <herb.schaltegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:48:27 -0500
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:18:46 -0500, Mary Pegg wrote
(in article <Wh_Nh.19498$7l1.4926@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
Pat Flannery wrote:
Speaking of old IJN battleships, they kept rebuilding the Fuso and
Yamashiro to the point where they ended up with these absurdly tall
superstructures:
Why "absurd"? The higher up you are, the more you can see.
IANANavalHistorian.
Negative considerations right off the top of my head:
- If the pagoda masts are too lightly armored, they're very easily damaged in
battle;
- If heavily armored enough they raise the center of gravity (and axis of
roll), negatively impacting gun accuracy and increasing risk of capsizing
when the hull floods asymmetrically;
- They make the ship more easily seen and identified visually an on radar;
I'm sure they're others but my already-short attention span is being dragged
elsewhere at the moment.
--
You can run on for a long time,
Sooner or later, God'll cut you down.
~Johnny Cash
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with 'no return ticket'
- From: Dale Carlson
- Re: USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with 'no return ticket'
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with 'no return ticket'
- From: Mary Pegg
- Re: USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with 'no return ticket'
- Prev by Date: Re: USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with 'no return ticket'
- Next by Date: Re: USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with 'no return ticket'
- Previous by thread: Re: USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with 'no return ticket'
- Next by thread: Re: USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with 'no return ticket'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|