Re: Apollo 11 coverage in Pravda and other Soviet news outlets

The USSR/Russia was every bit our willing partner in such crimes
against humanity. Sorry about that.

Even our "Ed Conrad" knows best, and yet even through Ed is right, as
such he doesn't realize the full extent as to half of what truth and
nothing but the truth there is to behold. For the past four decades
and counting, we've been summarily snookered (some if not many of us
to death) by way of those having "the right stuff", and that's
including the USSR right stuff. It's actually what certain bogus
religions and of their puppet governments do best, having cost us
those extra trillions of hard earned dollars per decade.

What silly topic bashings and diversions are these incest cloned
damage-control folks (Third Reich clowns) trying to pull off this time
around?

Oddly this following reply didn't manage to stick the first time, and
of course every other possible form of Usenet's spermware/fuckware is
still in the ongoing process of hitting my poor old PC like another
tonne of those nasty MI/NSA~MIB bricks.
-

On Apr 4, 3:11 pm, "Major Quaternion Dirt Quantum"
<Qnc...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
for the third time,
why would the eveningstar or morningstar (or
everyone's favorite UFO) be visible
fromMoon, unless the astronuts were there
when the "terminus" was upon them,
just after local sunset or
just before local sunrise?

Dear silly Jewboy, or whatever other faith-based moron, for at least
the hundredth if not a good thousandth time, Venus was not offering
itself as any point source of an illuminating star, whereas to the
unfiltered Kodak eye it's actually offering a brighter item for its
size and reflected spectrum than Earth, and upon those NASA/Apollo
missions of A11, A14 and A16 it wasn't even situated all that far
away.

In other kind words of my dyslexic encrypted wisdom, if their Kodak
moments of color or B&W images had no problems with their having
recorded the deep blue oceans of Earth, whereas they sure as hell
would not have had any problems whatsoever as having recorded Venus,
as well as a few other pesky items within that crystal clear and
otherwise dark sky above that physically dark moon.

Come to think about it, you folks are even born-again liars about what
the "physically dark" surface of our moon should have looked like, as
most certainly not looking as though being a terrestrial guano island
as having been xenon lamp spectrum illuminated to boot.


you're just looking at a God-am simulator;
can it simulate the relative brightness of the sky,
on Earth or onMoon?

Yes they can, and with great true to life detail if need be.

Why don't you post your superior 3D simulator examples of all sorts of
what stuff looks like when viewed from the naked and physically dark
moon. Obviously you've been afraid to share any such hour by hour
views that would have unavoidably included the likes of Venus, or for
that matter at least a couple of other available planets and Sirius
that would also have been within the DR and optical FOV spec..


of course, this is just a vraitaion upon
the post-1969 theme,
"Why didn't the fake astronauts photograph the stars !?!"

Most stars (with the exception of Sol) are entirely different than
local planets, although the Sirius star/solar system of such a bluish
and near-UV vibrance should have been in there too. The unfiltered
Kodak DR(dynamic range) scope and optical resolution was simply more
than sufficient. Sorry about that.


because, no-one wanted them to, including themselves --
no new information; in practice,
only astronomers do NOT ignore the POSITIONS of stars
at night -- certainly, astrologers never look at them!

You and others of your kind are so silly, arnt you. Just like
MESSENGER's image of a naked Earth, as not only presented without
other planets or stars, but also w/o moon (rather odd as derived from
a 14+ db CCD and of such quality mirror optics).


GOT 3-D SIMULATOR ?

GOT VENUS IN SIGHT, WHILE STANDING ON MOON?

thus:
you were imprisoned in Britain for What?http://www.wehavelandedonthemoon1969.myphilosophy.eu/

Double duh, and then some, Sir Spook (aka Third Reich minion). Way to
go!

Obviously you and others of your kind can't honestly prove squat on
behalf of those hocus-pocus NASA/Apollo landings. Are you suggesting
that all of NASA's Third Reich Jews as well as every other snookered
soul on Earth are every bit as dumb and dumber and/or as dumbfounded
as yourself?
-
Brad Guth


.

Loading