Re: Real Moon structure photographed by Zond 6 in 1968

On 24 Mag, 16:38, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 24, 4:04 am, sir.code.crac...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:





On May 23, 8:25 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On May 22, 8:42 am, sir.code.crac...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On May 22, 2:57 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On May 15, 3:11 am, Visitor <code_crac...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:06 am, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 25, 12:42 am, Sir Code Cracker <code_crac...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

I hope not to disappoint your expectations...my "PhotoShopassociate"
is not exactly an expert...but we'll try our best, of course.
Regards.

That's perfectly good enough. I'll be looking for those results, that
by rights should be somewhat better than mine.

Remember that you can take that 10% or less crop from the 650 k GIF
image and apply as much or as little of thosePhotoShopfeatures
that'll help to interpret further information from that original 225
meter/pixel image. Therefore, try to keep in mind that items of less
than 225 meters are going to become interesting but a little iffy.
However, that extremely big enough bridge item or especially of their
local tarmac that's just north of town are not hardly the least bit
iffy.
-BradGuth

HiBrad, sorry that I have been away for a while. It was not easy, but
I have those results, finally - the photos, I mean. How do I deliver
them to you?
SCC- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Sir Code Cracker and Visitor,
It has been some time. You nice folks apparently still haven't posted
your best PhotoShop or whatever enlargement examples of Venus. Is
there a lethal MIB(men in black) problem with getting those image
files posted? Did lord "OM" scare you off, or have you merely sent
them via email or perhaps by way of regular mail?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rc7mkHtuLOs
Quite old looking but otherwise an interesting notion, however, we
still do not have such proven fly-by-rocket expertise (robotic or
manned), nor have we the required rad hard DNA or any of that totally
nonreactive/(spectrum insensitive) Kodak film that supposedly had such
piss poor DR that it couldn't possibly have recorded Venus. Go
figure.
-
BradGuth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

HiBrad,

I have sent them to you to your GMAIL address yesterday (Sunday). You
didn't get my e-mail?

Oh, the Moon video is great! Is it for real?

Oddly, for the longest time this reply simply wasn't being allowed to
stick. It must be that your photo enlarge/enhance expertise was a
little better than expected because, it has taken more than day to
even accomplish getting this reply posted.

As to that very interesting item on the moon could be for real,
however our NASA/Apollo wizards supposedly taking the movie of such is
not all that likely for real. At best a purely robotic effort on our
part is what obtained those images, at worse it's just more of the
same old hocus-pocus that's intended to keep us honest folks as far
off track and every bit as divided/argumentative as possible.

I've rechecked my GMAIL account, and as I've said this before that MI/
NSA folks (aka spooks and moles) get to read and/or divert everything
prior to whatever I get to see. Therefore, in this case they've
entirely excluded your email and photo attachments.

Ever since interpreting that image of Venus that looks so entirely as
though we have intelligent ETs right nextdoor, I've been getting my
email accounts summarily trashed and otherwise having all sorts of
interesting stuff robo excluded and/or simply renamed so that it
otherwise gets treated and/or excluded as SPAM. I kid you not, that
all of this gauntlet of official flak started as of 7+ years ago,
shortly after I'd nicely informed our NASA of what I believe was worth
our taking a few other hard looks at.

Would you like to try it once again, this time include "Sir Code
Cracker" and/or Venus within the email subject line, and this time
send your message along with those image files off to both email
addresses.

The following robo moderated "bradg..." = bradguth

bradg...@xxxxxxxxx
bradg...@xxxxxxxxx

If this effort still doesn't work, I'll give you further instructions
for posting such into a public archive of photographs, short of your
having to send me a floppy disk in the regular mail.

I'm fairly certain that your enlargements and whatever honest
PhotoShop efforts have been worth the effort, and I'll be sure to
publish your's along with full credits as soon as my PC gets its CPU
hands on them.
-
BradGuth
-

GOOGLE/Usenet has been getting so pathetic, retarded and/or MIB
worthy.

Another good question of the day being;
Why the heck are a few select groups of Usenet so often going down for
the count, especially as of nearly every time folks like myself manage
to contribute a little something special and truth-worthy?

Is usenet having to robo moderate itself on behalf of keeping the rest
of the world from knowing the truth, as for such efforts taking up
that much of GOOGLEs CPU and data management resources?

As of lately, GOOGLE/Usenet is seriously sucking and blowing within
its infomercial spewing ***-cheeks worth of their own MI/NSA damage-
control wind, meaning that the current stink levels of their
intellectual flatulence is running fairly high. Otherwise meaning
that new and improved topic contributions of those most recent of
updates are either delayed for hours and/or getting robo-excluded on
the fly, while other parts of Usenet are functioning within spec,
whereas many times I've noticed the previous day's contributions as
having been accepted and yet never having arrived, similar to emails
sent to me that never arrived or got robo diverted before I ever had a
chance to review such messages.

So, in addition to my email accounts having been trashed and otherwise
of having files getting stealth modified and/or remote deleted is
apparently the status quo par for the ongoing topic/author stalking
and banishment course of Usenet's damage-control actions. And you
folks thought I was kidding about the Third Reich and of their Jewish
mindset friends, such as those of our 'Skull and Bones' being so alive
and kicking our butts. (afraid not)
-
BradGuth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

DearBrad,

I've resent my e-mail to you as suggested. Please, let me know if you
have got it this time.

Otherwise, we will invent another way.

Bye for now,

SCC- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thank you, as yes I did finally get to see your GIF image files. I'll
return the favor with a few of my step by step versions.

You're clearly not using the best of Adobe PhotoShop, not by any long
shot. Of course, my old/outdated PhotoShop isn't nearly as good as
what can otherwise be accomplished at 10X resampling without going
past the point of no return. As best I can tell, my version of photo
processing seems to max itself out at 8X.

However, your efforts are going in the right direction. You've
accomplished roughly 10% of what's doable. For now, stick with the
GFI format, but for the moment you should drop any color attributes
that'll only add to the given file size without having contributed
anything beneficial to the image itself.

Even by other than Adobe photo enhancement software can do at least
twice as good as what you've accomplished, so don't give up just yet.

A resampled image enlargement at as little as 3X is going to be
sufficient to start off with, whereas 5X is more than sufficient, as
that'll provide 25 times the number of pixels for your image filters
to work with.
-
Brad Guth- Nascondi testo tra virgolette -

- Mostra testo tra virgolette -

Hi Brad,

Finally, you have received my e-mails. I'm happy about that. Well, I
told you that I am a beginner with image editing, but thank you for
your sincere comments anyway. :-)

I will keep on training with Photoshop and I'll try to reach better
results. If you could give me some tips about how to use Photoshop
better, I would appreciate that. You know, bicubic, smoother, sharper,
width, pixels and so on....

By the way, the "sharpen/unsharpen" tool was greyed out, disabled, as
the GIF image was locked or something like that. In fact, I was not
able to enlarge the image more than 3x without producing unwatchable
results. About the colorization, it seemed to add clarity, but maybe
it was just my impression.

Concerning that video and photos of the ship on the Moon (Apollo 20),
it is really interesting. There is a photo on a Nasa website showing
the feature, which is really strange for a natural formation. But
everything's possible, isn't it?!

Back to the Magellan GIF... well, that radar image contains many weird
things, I agree with you. Some years ago I read that Venus'
temperature is not as high as they want us to believe and that there
is probably a terra-forming activity going on over there already. I
also read that in the 60's there was a guy who claimed to have come
from Venus, but I don't remember the details now. I have to do some
search on the web.

I'm getting more and more interested in this topic, I must say.

Bye for now!

SCC

.

Loading