Re: NASA's Griffin smoking crack?
- From: fredfighter@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:43:51 -0700
On Jun 2, 7:36 pm, "Scott Hedrick" <dinehnmNOS...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<fredfigh...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1180727766.373699.196100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 1, 1:13 am, "Scott Hedrick" <dinehnmNOS...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
With Mars and even Neptune showing signs of warming, yet both totally
lacking in SUVs, seems like at least part of the explanation lies with
the
most common factor, which would be the Sun.
DAGS "11 year suspot cycle".
So you've chosen to conclude that solar activity has increased over
the last 6 years, despite direct evidence to the contrary, simply
because you would prefer it to be true, right?
*I* have made no conclusion at all. To the contrary, as I've made clear in
other posts, there isn't enough data to warrant conclusions. There is no
*conclusion* to my comment about the sun, simply a logical inference.
It seems that you inferred an increase in the solar constant despite
clear evidence to the contrary.
--
FF
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NASA's Griffin smoking crack?
- From: Scott Hedrick
- Re: NASA's Griffin smoking crack?
- References:
- NASA's Griffin smoking crack?
- From: Stan Marsh
- Re: NASA's Griffin smoking crack?
- From: Scott Hedrick
- Re: NASA's Griffin smoking crack?
- From: fredfighter
- Re: NASA's Griffin smoking crack?
- From: Scott Hedrick
- NASA's Griffin smoking crack?
- Prev by Date: Re: NASAspaceflight.com - Censors the John Young - Ares I Thread.
- Next by Date: Re: NASA's Griffin smoking crack?
- Previous by thread: Re: NASA's Griffin smoking crack?
- Next by thread: Re: NASA's Griffin smoking crack?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading