Re: Can't We call the early Atlas a SSTO?
- From: Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:26:41 -0500
Monte Davis wrote:
General Dynamics Triamese, actually:
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/triamese.htm
More here: http://www.abo.fi/~mlindroo/SpaceLVs/Slides/sld020.htm
This looks a lot like an American take on MUSTARD: http://www.unrealaircraft.com/wings/bac_mustard.php
Pat
.
- References:
- Can't We call the early Atlas a SSTO?
- From: surfduke
- Re: Can't We call the early Atlas a SSTO?
- From: surfduke
- Re: Can't We call the early Atlas a SSTO?
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: Can't We call the early Atlas a SSTO?
- From: Craig Fink
- Re: Can't We call the early Atlas a SSTO?
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: Can't We call the early Atlas a SSTO?
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Can't We call the early Atlas a SSTO?
- From: John Halpenny
- Re: Can't We call the early Atlas a SSTO?
- From: Monte Davis
- Re: Can't We call the early Atlas a SSTO?
- From: Hyper
- Re: Can't We call the early Atlas a SSTO?
- From: Monte Davis
- Can't We call the early Atlas a SSTO?
- Prev by Date: Re: Caltech, JPL, Northrop Grumman to Celebrate 50 Years of Space Exploration
- Next by Date: Re: Can't We call the early Atlas a SSTO?
- Previous by thread: Re: Can't We call the early Atlas a SSTO?
- Next by thread: Re: Can't We call the early Atlas a SSTO?
- Index(es):
