Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Peter Stickney <p-stickney@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:39:12 -0400
Pat Flannery wrote:
Brian Thorn wrote:
The Air Force brass
sure does seem to have been neutered in the last 20 years... "we don't
care what our regulations say, Boeing, Lockheed and Northrop, we'll
designate your planes whatever you want.
Here's a goody: At the moment we are up to the Boeing 787...then comes
the 797...and then? :-\
1701, probably - the precedent's already in place.
Boeing's SST project from teh late '60s early '70s was the 2707.
--
Pete Stickney
Without data, all you have is an opinion
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Scott Hedrick
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- References:
- Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Proponent
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Brian Thorn
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Brian Thorn
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Pat Flannery
- Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- Prev by Date: Re: what is orbital speed around the moon?
- Next by Date: Re: what is orbital speed around the moon?
- Previous by thread: Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- Next by thread: Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading