Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:00:55 -0500
Peter Stickney wrote:
1701, probably
They are going to build a Constitution class starship?
Boy, I'd like to see Airbus take them on in _that_ competition. :-)
Pat
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- References:
- Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Proponent
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Brian Thorn
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Brian Thorn
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Peter Stickney
- Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- Prev by Date: Re: what is orbital speed around the moon?
- Next by Date: Re: NASA Astronauts Are Very Afraid.
- Previous by thread: Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- Next by thread: Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- Index(es):