Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" <mooregr_deleteth1s@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:03:24 -0400
"Peter Stickney" <p-stickney@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:g2j9q4-hc6.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Pat Flannery wrote:
Brian Thorn wrote:
The Air Force brass
sure does seem to have been neutered in the last 20 years... "we don't
care what our regulations say, Boeing, Lockheed and Northrop, we'll
designate your planes whatever you want.
Here's a goody: At the moment we are up to the Boeing 787...then comes
the 797...and then? :-\
1701, probably - the precedent's already in place.
Boeing's SST project from teh late '60s early '70s was the 2707.
Why that number?
--
Pete Stickney
Without data, all you have is an opinion
--
Greg Moore
SQL Server DBA Consulting Remote and Onsite available!
Email: sql (at) greenms.com http://www.greenms.com/sqlserver.html
.
- References:
- Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Proponent
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Brian Thorn
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Brian Thorn
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- From: Peter Stickney
- Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- Prev by Date: Re: NASA Astronauts Are Very Afraid.
- Next by Date: Re: NASA Astronauts Are Very Afraid.
- Previous by thread: Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- Next by thread: Re: Numbers for Bombers & Fighters (v. OT, but Somebody Here Probably Knows)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|