Re: Hoagland Attacks JimO over Apollo Coverup!!!

On Oct 26, 2:25 pm, "Jim Oberg" <job...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 10-25-07-2
SOURCE: Enterprise Mission
CONTACT: Mike Bara of Enterprise Mission, +1-310-701-3152,
mikeb...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

NASA Cover-Ups Continue.

NASA Dismisses Former Apollo Photo and Data Manager from JPL Educational
Program
Missing Apollo Data to be Shown at National Press Club Briefing Oct. 30

Dr. Ken Johnston, former Manager of the Data and Photo Control Department at
NASA's Lunar Receiving Laboratory during NASA's manned Apollo Lunar
Program, was abruptly terminated Tuesday morning, October 23rd, from JPL's
prestigious "Solar System Ambassador" (SSA) Program. All evidence of Dr.
Johnston's exemplary 4-year participation in the NASA outreach effort to
"communicate the importance of NASA aerospace programs to the public around
the world" has been scrubbed from the official JPL SSA website, without
formal notification of Dr. Johnston as to cause.

Johnston is a key participant in the upcoming October 30th, 2007 Enterprise
Mission press briefing at the National Press Club in Washington, DC (Zenger
Room, 9:00 AM). At that time, Johnston will reveal how NASA ordered him to
destroy key Apollo lunar images and data more than 40 years ago, rather than
allow them to be preserved for academic and public study. Johnston will
testify how he disobeyed these NASA orders, secretly preserving the critical
Apollo images-and the never-officially-published lunar discoveries recorded
on them. According to AP, NASA is currently embroiled in a similar
controversy with Congress because of the agency's planned destruction of
supporting data from a recent aviation safety study.

Johnston's startling Apollo allegations have recently appeared in a new
book, "Dark Mission: the Secret History of NASA," co-authored by former NASA
consultant and CBS Science Advisor, Richard C. Hoagland and Mike Bara, an
aerospace engineering consultant. According to Kay Ferrari, JPL Director of
the SSA Program (in a phone call to Johnston last week), it was Johnston
"being quoted [as] criticizing NASA in Hoagland's new book, 'Dark Mission,'"
that prompted her to ask for Johnston's resignation from the SSA Program.
When Johnston refused, citing First Amendment protections of free speech
afforded all NASA employees, even those at JPL, Ferrari apparently decided
to remove him arbitrarily from the SSA Program this week without cause.

JPL's ultimate decision to fire Dr. Johnston was initiated, according to
Ferrari's phone call, "by an initial inquiry to JPL from James Oberg, of NBC
News." Oberg is a former NASA contractor and a colleague of Johnston's at
NASA's Manned Spacecraft Center during the Apollo Program in the 1970's.
According to Ferrari, Oberg, in his e-mails, raised "serious issues
regarding Johnston's credentials" and his "crackpot accusations" against the
agency. Oberg's NASA contractor history begs ethical questions regarding his
efforts to get Johnston terminated, based on Johnston's testimony in "Dark
Mission" and intention to present further "missing" Apollo images and data
at the National Press Club.

Dr. Johnston will present documentation of his claims, credentials and key
role at NASA October 30th.

This following press event should have been at least half over by now,
with at the very least some viable info along with one good NASA/
Apollo image that we've never before seen, for getting usenet posted.
I wonder what's taking so long?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.space.history/browse_frm/thread/f326915ff445ad01/85a4f5446390fdcc#85a4f5446390fdcc

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro/browse_frm/thread/666efb808ae30256/557f86034fb4b63a#557f86034fb4b63a

Interesting as to how GOOGLE/NOVA sci.space.history and any other
usenet group as hosting this topic was so quick to cut us off at the
pass, just before this "NASA Cover-Ups Continue" of their National
Press Club thing got underway. I'm also getting summarily traumatised
by those extra ***-loads of their PC spermware/fuckware that's trying
every other dirty trick in their Old Testament book in order to
terminate my usenet access. Meanwhile, other usenet groups without
this topic have been much less affected.

I have no personal doubts as to the possibility of there having been
"ancient artificial ruins and technology on the Moon," as discovered
by our orbiting Apollo robotics (thought not as via astronauts) and
perhaps as such having been legally classified under the 1958 Space
Act by NASA for over 40 years.

As to the demonstration and analyzing one of those supposed secret
technologies retrieved by the Apollo crews, relating to the artificial
control of gravity, is entirely proof positive of the ongoing ruse/
sting nature of this forever hocus-pocus fiasco, of the silly hype
worth of infowar/infomercial spewing that's at the very disinformation
root of most all things NASA and pretend-atheists at the same time.

There is simply no possible way that Ken or Richard are actually rogue
agents working outside of MI5/NSA/CIA~NASA orchestration or
moderation, and still alive to be sharing such supposed secrets (far
less crimes would get such folks put into our secret prisons and if
need be waterboarded to death without so much as any speck of due
process). I would believe that it does our NASA much good having such
a insider ruse/sting ongoing, because it only makes everything else
NASA look all that more believable. However, if this press event
brings further attention to our physically dark and somewhat salty old
moon that's always saturated in gamma, plus especially X-ray and
double IR nasty by day, then so be it.

BTW, you folks do recall what happened to that certain other original
NASA safety engineer whistleblower and of his entire family, don't
you?

Not only did those pesky MIB manage to arrange that rather unfortunate
encounter with a locomotive, but also having scrubbed out his entire
safety report, as well as that of his field office and most of
everything else got scrubbed off the face of Earth, almost like he
never existed.

Perhaps something similar will happen to Dr. Ken Johnston. (does Ken
Johnston have a reliable posse that's packing heat?) Or, is this
simply another pretend sort of whistleblower ruse thing that our
government and NASA are really good at pulling off. (at least if I
were NASA, it's exactly what kind of stealth damage-control that I'd
be doing right about now)

It seems as though anything that further supports the notions of our
NASA/Apollo astronauts actually walking moonsuit *** naked on that
moon of ours is good enough, even if it comes by way of other
rusemasters trying to pull off whatever can suggest that we'd walked
on that dusty old moon with our unfiltered optics and Kodak film that
was somehow immune to such raw UV or even UV secondary/recoil photons,
and otherwise simply couldn't notice or much less record Venus.

It'll be downright interesting as to a head count and ID of those
attending this Enterprise Mission news event. I wonder what sort of
back page of which obscure newspaper or publication it'll get reported
upon? (perhaps Play Boy or LeapFrog will run something in pop-up
format)
- Brad Guth -

.