Re: Three Space What-ifs, a common theme

On Oct 11, 6:04 pm, neopeius <fa...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
1) For some reason, Korolev remains calm despite delays on his 1500kg
Sputnik. The satellite is not launched until May of 1958--after
Vanguard 1 becomes the first artificial satellite in March.

2) The November flight of Pioneer 2 becomes the first artificial
satellite to fly past the moon, returning valuable scientific
information (though the tv camera returns nothing usable). Russia's
Luna 1 does not duplicate the feat until early January of 1959.

3) The astronauts contend that Von Braun is too cautious and prevail
in their desire to launch Alan Shepard on a suborbital flight on March
24, 1961--thus, an American is the first in space, over a month ahead
of the first cosmonaut, Yuri Gagarin.

I think these what-ifs are ordered in increasing degree of
probability. They all serve to narrow the space race by having the
Americans succeed first, but then are quickly upstaged by a much more
capable Soviet flight.

This isn't like the Americans making it to the moon first and the
Soviets, far behind, declaring that a race never existed. These what-
ifs are not clear victories for the Americans, but they do give early
wins when they are perhaps the most vital. Is a closer space race
good for either side, or does it breed complacency in the US and
frustration followed by despair in the USSR?


Why not share two or three more "what ifs"?

What if our semitic Third Reich wizards of most everything that was
NASA/Apollo, were still in charge of your private parts? (how much
longer before WWIII?)

What if in spite of knowing the whole truth and nothing but the truth,
you silly folks insisted upon staying fully snookered and dumbfounded
past the point of no return?

The honest to God space race to our moon is nearly a done deal, as a
lunar based Chinese take-out franchise is likely to open soon,
starting with the moon's L1 and working their way down to that nasty
surface with those rad-hard androids and other robotics leading the
way.

What part of our NASA/Apollo LLPOF worth of their supposed missions to/
from that highly electrostatic charged, as naked anticathode gamma+X-
ray+UV+IR(by day) saturated, and otherwise of such fluffy crystal dry
worth of an extremely low surface tension environment, of our somewhat
salty and PHYSICALLY DARK moon is still all that believable?

Of course China is most likely to takeover the primary control of our
moon, as well as of its most valuable L1. (wouldn't you, if you only
could?)

Here's a couple of little extra astronomy and hard core physics truth
worthy kinds of news that we can all use:

Comet Holmes Bigger Than The Sun
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astronomy/browse_frm/thread/035fd77608e6cc36

http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/faculty/jewitt/holmes.html

Secondly, the book "Dark Mission" is actually a darn good name for
most any lunar kind of mission, and our good old Richard C. Hoagland
is clearly one of them pesky insiders that can obviously get away with
publishing almost anything, as long as it directly or indirectly
supports their NASA/Apollo ongoing ruse/sting of the century.

As per the usual Zion Third Reich plan of their global domination
actions, it seems these faith-based and thus incest mutated and
otherwise borg like folks of our NASA/Apollo disinformation fuckology
are right as rain, as we outsider kind of honest village idiots do in
fact suffer rather badly from the "specific type of mental disorder"
called the WTANBTTD (whole truth and nothing but the truth disorder).

In third place is "Japan First Back To The Moon!" / kT
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.space.policy/browse_frm/thread/f38a85929879b6a0

That's absolutely right, however China is not exactly sitting on their
extremely wise old butts, are they.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html

BTW, notice how extremely dark and otherwise somewhat average coal
like 0.11 or actually of a slightly sooty darker kind of soft albedo,
that which our extremely dusty old and electrostatic charged moon
really is, as having been so clearly JAXA/HVTV imaged within the very
same FOV, as well as having been illuminated by the very same raw
solar spectrum that's unavoidably skewed by the excess amount of those
violet and UV photons.

Do we see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking the
least bit NASA/Apollo 0.65~0.075 albedo worthy, like a certain guano
island as xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and otherwise physically
modified to suit their hocus-pocus landings? (silly question, as I
didn't think so)

Now try to imagine how much brighter than Earth the little violet
color skewed pixel(s) worth of Venus are going to look. Actually the
likes of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn should also become part of those
future JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE) obtained images, along with a few of those
most bright of background stars unless having been intentionally
spectrum filtered out or PhotoShop removed.

And to think that there's so much more of the truth to come via JAXA/
KAGUYA(SELENE), as well as from whatever China can uncover is just
around the next corner.
--
Brad Guth

.