Re: Spy satellite unscheduled de-orbit
- From: "thomsona@xxxxxxxxx" <thomsona@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:14:13 -0800 (PST)
Pat wrote, and then
On Jan 27, 11:08 am, Brian Thorn <bthor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm interested in the "hazardous materials" part of the report.
I assume they mean hydrazine, but replacing the solar arrays with RTGs
could make a satellite more stealthy, by decreasing its brightness in
the sky.
RTGs seem unlikely, given how there wasn't enough for New Horizons a
year earlier. I doubt the U.S. would bother with them on a modest
satellite like this.
I agree that, if there's anything to the "hazardous materials" bit,
it's likely to be hydrazine and N2O4.
A slight caveat is that back in 2002 NASA was told to transfer 7 kg of
Pu238 to an "undisclosed national security agency." (A correspondent
recalls seeing that the transfer had been canceled.)
http://www.space.com/news/nasa_plutonium_020724.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Spy satellite unscheduled de-orbit
- From: Bob Tenney
- Re: Spy satellite unscheduled de-orbit
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Spy satellite unscheduled de-orbit
- References:
- Spy satellite unscheduled de-orbit
- From: Rupert Goodwins
- Re: Spy satellite unscheduled de-orbit
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Spy satellite unscheduled de-orbit
- From: Brian Thorn
- Spy satellite unscheduled de-orbit
- Prev by Date: Re: Spy satellite unscheduled de-orbit
- Next by Date: Re: The Thiokol "don't launch/do launch" Challenger memo
- Previous by thread: Re: Spy satellite unscheduled de-orbit
- Next by thread: Re: Spy satellite unscheduled de-orbit
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|